Provision and appropriation of common-pool resources without full disclosure

22Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Some open systems use mutually agreed rules to determine a decentralised allocation of endogenous common-pool resources, i.e. resources that are provided by the system components themselves. The problem is that some components may not comply to the rules, and an open system cannot demand the full disclosure required to verify compliance. This requires behaviour to be monitored, but monitoring must be 'paid for' from the same resources, detracting from the system's capability to perform tasks for which it was intended. This paper addresses the problem from the perspective of principles for self-governing institutions, encapsulating a formal system of retributive justice. Experiments with a variant of the linear public good game show that self-organisation of operational-choice rules for monitoring and sanctioning can help to reduce costs, marginalise non-compliance and increase collective utility. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pitt, J., & Schaumeier, J. (2012). Provision and appropriation of common-pool resources without full disclosure. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 7455 LNAI, pp. 199–213). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32729-2_14

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free