Cognitive semiotics. radical enactivism, pragmatism and material engagement

1Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

As suggested by Goran Sonesson (2012: 208) in a seminal article, “cognitive semiotics has been invented many times during the last decades”. Cognitive semiotics can indeed be many things, and there are many ways to “invent” it. Some of these things and ways are de facto. Other things and other ways are de iure. I will not proceed to create a new invention. Rather, in this book I will try to clarify the articulation between what cognitive semiotics is de facto and what, in my perspective, should be able to be de iure.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Paolucci, C. (2021). Cognitive semiotics. radical enactivism, pragmatism and material engagement. In Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy and Psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 1–25). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42986-7_1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free