Improved laboratory transition probabilities for ce ii, application to the cerium abundances of the sun and five r-process-rich, metal-poor stars, and rare earth lab data summary

139Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Recent radiative lifetime measurements accurate to 5% using laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) on 43 even-parity and 15 odd-parity levels of Ce II have been combined with new branching fractions measured using a Fourier transform spectrometer (FTS) to determine transition probabilities for 921 lines of Ce II. This improved laboratory data set has been used to determine a new solar photospheric Ce abundance, log ε = 1.61 0.01 (σ = 0.06 from 45 lines), a value in excellent agreement with the recommended meteoritic abundance, log ε = 1.61 0.02. Revised Ce abundances have also been derived for the r-process-rich metal-poor giant stars BD+17°3248, CS 22892-052, CS 31082-001, HD 115444, and HD 221170. Between 26 and 40 lines were used for determining the Ce abundance in these five stars, yielding a small statistical uncertainty of 0.01 dex similar to the solar result. The relative abundances in the metal-poor stars of Ce and Eu, a nearly pure r-process element in the Sun, matches r-process-only model predictions for solar system material. This consistent match with small scatter over a wide range of stellar metallicities lends support to these predictions of elemental fractions. A companion paper includes an interpretation of these new precision abundance results for Ce as well as new abundance results and interpretation for Pr, Dy, and Tm. © 2009. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Lawler, J. E., Sneden, C., Cowan, J. J., Ivans, I. I., & Den Hartog, E. A. (2009). Improved laboratory transition probabilities for ce ii, application to the cerium abundances of the sun and five r-process-rich, metal-poor stars, and rare earth lab data summary. Astrophysical Journal, Supplement Series, 182(1), 51–79. https://doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/182/1/51

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free