Time trends, projections, and spatial distribution of low birthweight in Australia, 2009–2030: Evidence from the National Perinatal Data Collection

3Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: Infants with low birthweight (LBW, birthweight <2500 g) have increased in many high-resource countries over the past two decades. This study aimed to investigate the time trends, projections, and spatial distribution of LBW in Australia, 2009–2030. Methods: We used standard aggregate data on 3 346 808 births from 2009 to 2019 from Australia's National Perinatal Data Collection. Bayesian linear regression model was used to estimate the trends in the prevalence of LBW in Australia. Results: Wefound that the prevalence of LBW was 6.18% in 2009, which has increased to 6.64% in 2019 (average annual rate of change, AARC = +0.76%). If the national trend remains the same, the projected prevalence of LBW in Australia will increase to 7.34% (95% uncertainty interval, UI = 6.99, 7.68) in 2030. Observing AARC across different subpopulations, the trend of LBW was stable among Indigenous mothers, whereas it increased among non-Indigenous mothers (AARC = +0.81%). There is also an increase among the most disadvantaged mothers (AARC = +1.08%), birthing people in either of two extreme age groups (AARC = +1.99% and +1.53% for <20 years and ≥40 years, respectively), and mothers who smoked during pregnancy (AARC = +1.52%). Spatiotemporal maps showed that some of the Statistical Area level 3 (SA3) in Northern Territory and Queensland had consistently higher prevalence for LBW than the national average from 2014 to 2019. Conclusion: Overall, the prevalence of LBW has increased in Australia during 2009–2019; however, the trends vary across different subpopulations. If trends persist, Australia will not achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) target of a 30% reduction in LBW by 2030. Centering and supporting the most vulnerable subpopulations is vital to progress the SDGs and improves perinatal and infant health in Australia.

References Powered by Scopus

Outcomes in young adulthood for very-low-birth-weight infants

983Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Fetal programming and adult health

774Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

National, regional, and worldwide estimates of low birthweight in 2015, with trends from 2000: a systematic analysis

653Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Spatio-temporal distribution and socioeconomic inequality of low birthweight rate in China from 1992 to 2021 and its predictions to 2030

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Impact of low birth weight on academic attainment during adolescence: A comprehensive retrospective cohort study using linked data

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Geographical disparities in temporal trends of low birth weight in Saskatchewan from 2002/2003 to 2021/2022: insights from a joinpoint regression analysis

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Huda, M. M., Callaway, L. K., Jackson, G., Fatima, Y., Cumming, J., Biswas, T., … Mamun, A. A. (2023). Time trends, projections, and spatial distribution of low birthweight in Australia, 2009–2030: Evidence from the National Perinatal Data Collection. Birth, 50(1), 76–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12708

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 7

78%

Researcher 2

22%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 4

44%

Social Sciences 3

33%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1

11%

Physics and Astronomy 1

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free