Penetrating abdominal injuries: Management controversies

46Citations
Citations of this article
113Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Penetrating abdominal injuries have been traditionally managed by routine laparotomy. New understanding of trajectories, potential for organ injury, and correlation with advanced radiographic imaging has allowed a shift towards non-operative management of appropriate cases. Although a selective approach has been established for stab wounds, the management of abdominal gunshot wounds remains a matter of controversy. In this chapter we describe the rationale and methodology of selecting patients for non-operative management. We also discuss additional controversial issues, as related to antibiotic prophylaxis, management of asymptomatic thoracoabdominal injuries, and the use of colostomy vs. primary repair for colon injuries. © 2009 Butt et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Butt, M. U., Zacharias, N., & Velmahos, G. C. (2009, April 17). Penetrating abdominal injuries: Management controversies. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-17-19

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free