Calcium-binding to lens βb2- and βa3-crystallins suggests that all β-crystallins are calcium-binding proteins

52Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Crystallins are the major proteins of a mammalian eye lens. The topologically similar eye lens proteins, β- and γ-crystallins, are the prototype and founding members of the βγ-crystallin superfamily. βγ-Crystallins have until recently been regarded as structural proteins. However, the calcium-binding properties of a few members and the potential role of βγ-crystallins in fertility are being investigated. Because the calcium-binding elements of other member proteins, such as spherulin 3a, are not present in βB2-crystallin and other βγ-crystallins from fish and mammalian genomes, it was argued that lens βγ-crystallins should not bind calcium. In order to probe whether β-crystallins can bind calcium, we selected one basic (βB2) and one acidic (βA3) β-crystallin for calcium-binding studies. Using calcium-binding assays such as 45Ca overlay, terbium binding, Stains-All and isothermal titration calorimetry, we established that both βB2- and βA3-crystallin bind calcium with moderate affinity. There was no significant change in their conformation upon binding calcium as monitored by fluorescence and circular dichroism spectroscopy. However, 15N-1H heteronuclear single quantum correlation NMR spectroscopy revealed that amide environment of several residues underwent changes indicating calcium ligation. With the corroboration of calcium-binding to βB2- and βA3-crystallins, we suggest that all β-crystallins bind calcium. Our results have important implications for understanding the calcium-related cataractogenesis and maintenance of ionic homeostasis in the lens. © 2007 The Authors.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jobby, M. K., & Sharma, Y. (2007). Calcium-binding to lens βb2- and βa3-crystallins suggests that all β-crystallins are calcium-binding proteins. FEBS Journal, 274(16), 4135–4147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-4658.2007.05941.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free