On the benefit of automated static analysis for small and medium-sized software enterprises

5Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Today's small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in the software industry are faced with major challenges. While having to work efficiently using limited resources they have to perform quality assurance on their code to avoid the risk of further effort for bug fixes or compensations. Automated static analysis can reduce this risk because it promises little effort for running an analysis. We report on our experience in analysing five projects from and with SMEs by three different static analysis techniques: code clone detection, bug pattern detection and architecture conformance analysis. We found that the effort that was needed to introduce those techniques was small (mostly below one person-hour), that we can detect diverse defects in production code and that the participating companies perceived the usefulness of the presented techniques as well as our analysis results high enough to include the techniques in their quality assurance. © 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gleirscher, M., Golubitskiy, D., Irlbeck, M., & Wagner, S. (2012). On the benefit of automated static analysis for small and medium-sized software enterprises. In Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing (Vol. 94 LNBIP, pp. 14–38). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27213-4_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free