How to Predict Future Migration: Different Methods Explained and Compared

9Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

How many people will likely move in the decades to come? And where will they come from and move to? Policymakers worldwide have a keen interest in these questions. While long-term developments in international migration patterns are relevant for the demography and economy of a country, sudden flows—for example, in the case of humanitarian emergencies—pose institutional challenges regarding reception capacities, health systems, housing, education, and training programs amongst others. This chapter reviews key concepts related to migration scenarios and forecasting. It outlines different qualitative and quantitative approaches, compares different studies, and discusses the potential use of various techniques for academic and policy audiences.

References Powered by Scopus

The origins and evolution of scenario techniques in long range business planning

794Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Causal layered analysis: poststructuralism as method

356Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Demographic forecasting: 1980 to 2005 in review

220Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

How well can we predict climate migration? A review of forecasting models

7Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Forecasting Population in an Uncertain World: Approaches, New Uses, and Troubling Limitations

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Modelling Migration

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

de Valk, H. A. G., Acostamadiedo, E., Guan, Q., Melde, S., Mooyaart, J., Sohst, R. R., & Tjaden, J. (2022). How to Predict Future Migration: Different Methods Explained and Compared. In IMISCOE Research Series (pp. 463–482). Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-92377-8_28

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 2

40%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

40%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 1

25%

Social Sciences 1

25%

Arts and Humanities 1

25%

Psychology 1

25%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free