Counterfactual regression with importance sampling weights

87Citations
Citations of this article
98Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Perhaps the most pressing concern of a patient diagnosed with cancer is her life expectancy under various treatment options. For a binary-treatment case, this translates into estimating the difference between the outcomes (e.g., survival time) of the two available treatment options - i.e., her Individual Treatment Effect (ITE). This is especially challenging to estimate from observational data, as that data has selection bias: the treatment assigned to a patient depends on that patient's attributes. In this work, we borrow ideas from domain adaptation to address the distributional shift between the source (outcome of the administered treatment, appearing in the observed training data) and target (outcome of the alternative treatment) that exists due to selection bias. We propose a context-aware importance sampling re-weighing scheme, built on top of a representation learning module, for estimating ITEs. Empirical results on two publicly available benchmarks demonstrate that the proposed method significantly outperforms state-of-the-art.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hassanpour, N., & Greiner, R. (2019). Counterfactual regression with importance sampling weights. In IJCAI International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 2019-August, pp. 5880–5887). International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2019/815

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free