Artificial Intelligence in Emergency Trauma Care: A Preliminary Scoping Review

1Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the use of generative artificial intelligence in the emergency trauma care setting through a brief scoping review of literature published between 2014 and 2024. An exploration of the NCBI repository was performed using a search string of selected keywords that returned N=87 results; articles that met the inclusion criteria (n=28) were reviewed and analyzed. Heterogeneity sources were explored and identified by a significance threshold of P < 0.10 or an I2 value exceeding 50%. If applicable, articles were categorized within three primary domains: triage, diagnostics, or treatment. Findings suggest that CNNs demonstrate strong diagnostic performance for diverse traumatic injuries, but generalized integration requires expanded prospective multi-center validation. Injury scoring models currently experience calibration gaps in mortality quantification and lesion localization that can undermine clinical utility by permitting false negatives. Triage predictive models now confront transparency, explainability, and healthcare ecosystem integration barriers limiting real-world translation. The most significant literature gap centers on treatment-oriented generative AI applications that provide real-time guidance for urgent trauma interventions rather than just analytical support.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ventura, C. A. I., Denton, E. E., & David, J. A. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in Emergency Trauma Care: A Preliminary Scoping Review. Medical Devices: Evidence and Research. Dove Medical Press Ltd. https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S467146

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free