Simple but Effective Criteria: Rethinking Excellent Qualitative Research

2Citations
Citations of this article
68Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Despite unremitting efforts to develop quality criteria of qualitative research, traditional criteria for the trustworthiness of qualitative results are still predominant in interpretive and naturalistic inquiries including Ph.D. studies. This work does not aim to replace the existing quality criteria but rather to update and simplify those criteria to include credibility, confirmability, and representativeness. The purpose of the study is to offer a review of existing criteria and strategies for qualitative research and to suggest simple criteria and strategies that will win the confidence of the academic community and augment the trustworthiness of qualitative research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Megheirkouni, M., & Moir, J. (2023). Simple but Effective Criteria: Rethinking Excellent Qualitative Research. Qualitative Report, 28(3), 848–864. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2023.5845

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free