Reasons for action, acting for reasons, and rationality

42Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

What kind of thing is a reason for action? What is it to act for a reason? And what is the connection between acting for a reason and rationality? There is controversy about the many issues raised by these questions. In this paper I shall answer the first question with a conception of practical reasons that I call ‘Factualism’, which says that all reasons are facts. I defend this conception against its main rival, Psychologism, which says that practical reasons are mental states or mental facts, and also against a variant of Factualism that says that some practical reasons are facts and others are false beliefs. I argue that the conception of practical reasons defended here (i) provides plausible answers to the second and third questions above; and (ii) gives a more unified and satisfactory picture of practical reasons than those offered by its rivals.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Alvarez, M. (2018). Reasons for action, acting for reasons, and rationality. Synthese, 195(8), 3293–3310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-015-1005-9

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free