Prognostic significance of cystatin C in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction

37Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Cystatin C is reportedly a better endogenous marker of glomerular filtration rate than serum creatinine, so the prognostic value of cystatin C in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI) was evaluated in the present study. Methods and Results: A total of 71 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation MI<24h from symptom onset were included. According to cystatin C level, patients were classified into 2 groups: (1) higher cystatin C group (n=33) and (2) lower cystatin C group (n=38). There was a trend toward more in-hospital deaths in patients with the higher cystatin C level compared with the lower cystatin C level group (15.2% vs 2.6%, P=0.06). Mean duration of clinical follow-up was 5.6±2.8 months. There was no significant difference in death, reinfarction, disabling stroke or target lesion revascularization between the 2 groups. However, a higher incidence of rehospitalization for congestive heart failure was observed in patients with the higher cystatin C level than in those with the lower cystatin C level (15.2% vs 0%, P=0.01). Conclusions: Cystatin C may be associated with more cardiovascular events, mainly rehospitalization for congestive heart failure, after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation MI.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ichimoto, E., Jo, K., Kobayashi, Y., Inoue, T., Nakamura, Y., Kuroda, N., … Komuro, I. (2009). Prognostic significance of cystatin C in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Circulation Journal, 73(9), 1669–1673. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-08-0943

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free