Am I being dehumanized? Development and validation of the experience of dehumanization measurement

3Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Scholarly interest in the experience of dehumanization, the perception that one is being dehumanized, has increased significantly in recent years, yet the construct lacks a validated measurement. The purpose of this research is therefore to develop and validate a theoretically grounded experience of dehumanization measurement (EDHM) using item response theory. Evidence from five studies using data collected from participants in the United Kingdom (N = 2082) and Spain (N = 1427), shows that (a) a unidimensional structure replicates and fits well; (b) the measurement demonstrates high precision and reliability across a broad range of the latent trait; (c) the measurement demonstrates evidence for nomological and discriminant validity with constructs in the experience of dehumanization nomological network; (d) the measurement is invariant across gender and cultures; (e) the measurement demonstrates incremental validity in the prediction of important outcomes over and above conceptually overlapping constructs and prior measurements. Overall, our findings suggest the EDHM is a psychometrically sound measurement that can advance research relating to the experience of dehumanization.

References Powered by Scopus

113174Citations
81565Readers
Get full text

This article is free to access.

Back-translation for cross-cultural research

9835Citations
3399Readers
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Golossenko, A., Palumbo, H., Mathai, M., & Tran, H. A. (2023). Am I being dehumanized? Development and validation of the experience of dehumanization measurement. British Journal of Social Psychology, 62(3), 1285–1329. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12633

Readers over time

‘23‘24‘2505101520

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 5

36%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

29%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 4

29%

Researcher 1

7%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 7

50%

Business, Management and Accounting 5

36%

Social Sciences 1

7%

Arts and Humanities 1

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0