Hegel on Scepticism and Irony

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The present essay studies the relationship between skepticism and irony in Hegel’s philosophy. Skepticism represents for Hegel an essential moment in the construction of any true philosophy, for it both represents its introduction as well as its negative side, in which the finite determinations of the intellect contradict themselves, thus revealing their inadequacy. Socratic irony appears to accomplish an analogous function, in that it criticizes false knowledge. Hegel, however, has never thought to raise Socratic irony to a rank equivalent to that taken by Skepticism, because irony is a subjective dialogue strategy, marked by the personal relationship with the discussant; but it is also connected to a bygone age, that of Classical Greece, which cannot be replicated. It follows that Romantic irony cannot perform the function of Skepticism: Schlegel’s attempt to raise irony to a higher spiritual activity is firmly condemned by Hegel, because it becomes an exasperated form of subjectivism, which annihilates what is objective.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Biscuso, M. (2013). Hegel on Scepticism and Irony. In International Archives of the History of Ideas/Archives Internationales d’Histoire des Idees (Vol. 210, pp. 299–314). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4810-1_20

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free