A comparative study of pseudo relevance feedback for ad-hoc retrieval

12Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper presents an initial investigation in the relative effectiveness of different popular pseudo relevance feedback (PRF) methods. The retrieval performance of relevance model, and two KL-divergence-based divergence from randomness (DFR) feedback methods generalized from Rocchio's algorithm, are compared by extensive experiments on standard TREC test collections. Results show that a KL-divergence based DFR method (denoted as KL1), combined with the classical Rocchio's algorithm, has the best retrieval effectiveness out of the three methods studied in this paper. © 2011 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hui, K., He, B., Luo, T., & Wang, B. (2011). A comparative study of pseudo relevance feedback for ad-hoc retrieval. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 6931 LNCS, pp. 318–322). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23318-0_30

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free