A comparison between film-screen mammography and full-field digital mammography utilizing phase contrast technology in breast cancer screening programs

21Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A digital phase contrast mammography (PCM) system was introduced into a hospital's screening programs with the expectation of improved clinical image quality. A total of 3835 examinations with the PCM system and 4338 examinations with a film-screen (FS) system were performed. The screening performance measures of the two systems were compared. Both in recall rates and in cancer detection rates, the performances of PCM and FS exhibited no statistically significant difference. For microcalcifications and masses, recall rates were lower with PCM than with FS despite the fact that more findings were reported with PCM. It would appear that PCM's superior depiction of abnormalities helped radiologists improve the accuracy of categorization. PCM is considered a beneficial imaging modality in breast cancer screening programs. © 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Morita, T., Yamada, M., Kano, A., Nagatsuka, S., Honda, C., & Endo, T. (2008). A comparison between film-screen mammography and full-field digital mammography utilizing phase contrast technology in breast cancer screening programs. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 5116 LNCS, pp. 48–54). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70538-3_7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free