The "frequentist" approach to statistics, currently dominating statistical practice in astrophysics, is compared to the historically older Bayesian approach, which is now growing in popularity in other scientific disciplines, and which provides unique, optimal solutions to well-posed problems. The two approaches address the same questions with very different calculations, but in simple cases often give the same final results, confusing the issue of whether one is superior to the other. Here frequentist and Bayesian methods are applied to problems where such a mathematical coincidence does not occur, allowing assessment of their relative merits based on their performance, rather than philosophical argument.
CITATION STYLE
Loredo, T. J. (1992). Promise of Bayesian Inference for Astrophysics. In Statistical Challenges in Modern Astronomy (pp. 275–297). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9290-3_31
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.