Hormesis: Public health policy, organizational safety and risk communication

2Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Thirty years of research suggests low doses of toxic substances may have positive health effects. If confirmed, hormesis will imply radical changes in risk assessment and management of existing industrial toxic sources (chemical and nuclear). Renn analyses risk communication issues and positions hormesis - largely unknown to the public today - as a hypothetical risk object in society. Our comments stress the necessity to consider hormesis first as a public health issue (versus an industrial regulatory issue), to consider the impact of managerial changes upon organizational safety culture, and to assess effects on public health from the 'bad news' of toxic exposure.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Poumadère, M. (2003). Hormesis: Public health policy, organizational safety and risk communication. Human and Experimental Toxicology, 22(1), 39–41. https://doi.org/10.1191/0960327103ht318oa

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free