Bioterrorism: Intentional introduction of animal disease

7Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The possibility of the intentional introduction of animal disease as an act of bioterrorism adds a new dimension to the development of strategies for assessment, prevention, response and recovery from exotic diseases, including the zoonoses. The vulnerability of livestock operations, the likelihood of success, the possibility of the use of genetically engineered organisms and limited resources to handle multiple outbreaks place new pressures on policy-makers and emergency responders to make best use of limited resources. The methods for managing a natural occurrence or accidental introduction of highconsequence diseases are generally applicable to containment and recovery from outbreaks of intentionally introduced animal diseases. Zoonotic agents increase the complexity at both international and national levels. Modern biology provides both increased threat of new disease entities and methods for earlier and more effective detection and intervention. Improved methods are emerging for defining trade restrictions and animal movement and for determining when it is safe to resume normal trade.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Clarke, N. P., & Rinderknecht, J. L. (2011). Bioterrorism: Intentional introduction of animal disease. OIE Revue Scientifique et Technique, 30(1), 131–138. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.30.1.2017

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free