On Being an Ombudsman: Protecting the Public Interest While Navigating the Minefield of Policy Networks

0Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

After 50 years of institutional history in Canada, the focus of ombuds has shifted from resolving individual complaints to improving the quality of government services for all. New tools in the ombuds world enabled the conceptualization and promotion of administrative fairness. Ombuds’ acquired expertise, which, shared with government, improved the delivery of services. Public systemic investigations are now seen as the ultimate expression of ombuds effectiveness. Consistent dialogue with public servants and organisational administrators inevitably links ombuds to policy networks. While informal links to policy networks can help ombuds resolve cases, they can also inadvertently create distance between ombuds and complainants. A former ombuds officer at Columbia University, Marsha Wagner emphasizes the importance of identifying systemic issues in ombuds practice, i.e., ombuds who do not focus on systemic issues may be derided as “wannabes”. This article suggests the pendulum has swung too far from the individual complainant to a systemic focus and urges caution in contemporary ombudship.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Johns, D., & Epperson, B. (2022). On Being an Ombudsman: Protecting the Public Interest While Navigating the Minefield of Policy Networks. Canadian Journal of Bioethics, 5(3), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.7202/1092953ar

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free