Apolipoprotein E genotype and cognitive dysfunction after noncardiac surgery

85Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Apolipoprotein E is important in recovery after neuronal damage. The ε4 allele of the apolipoprotein E gene has been shown as a risk factor for Alzheimer disease, poor outcome after cerebral injury, and accelerated cognitive decline with normal aging. The authors hypothesized that patients with the ε4 allele would have an increased risk of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) after noncardiac surgery. Methods: In a multicenter study, a total of 976 patients aged 40 yr and older undergoing noncardiac surgery were tested preoperatively and 1 week and 3 months after surgery with a neuropsychological test battery comprising seven subtests. POCD was defined as a decline in test performance of more than 2 SD from the expected. Apolipoprotein E genotypes were determined by blood sample analysis at a central laboratory. Multivariate logistic regression analysis with POCD as the dependent variable assessed presence of the ε4 allele (yes/no) and other possible risk factors. Results: The ε4 allele was found in 272 patients. One week after surgery, the incidence of POCD was 11.7% in patients with the ε4 allele and 9.9% in patients without the ε4 allele (P = 0.41). Three months later, POCD was found in 10.3% of patients with the ε4 allele and in 8.4% of patients without the ε4 allele (P = 0.40). Multivariate logistic regression analysis did not identify the ε4 allele as a risk factor at 1 week (P = 0.33) or 3 months (P = 0.57). Conclusions: The authors were unable to show a significant association between apolipoprotein E genotype and POCD, but statistical power was limited because of a lower incidence of POCD than expected.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Abildstrom, H., Christiansen, M., Siersma, V. D., & Rasmussen, L. S. (2004). Apolipoprotein E genotype and cognitive dysfunction after noncardiac surgery. Anesthesiology, 101(4), 855–861. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200410000-00009

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free