Rights, proportionality, and process in EU counterterrorism lawmaking

2Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Proportionality is a key principle of EU law. However, in spite of procedural requirements intended to ensure the full integration of proportionality as a design principle in EU law, the European Union continues to pass disproportionate counterterrorism laws. If proportionality is a fundamental constitutional principle of the European Union, and if lawmaking processes at EU level have been designed expressly with this in mind, then why do the EU's counterterrorism laws consistently raise issues of disproportionate interference with rights? Taking as a case study the passage of the EU Directive on Combating Terrorism, this article argues that at least part of the answer lies in the curtailment and adjustment, in the counterterrorism field, of lawmaking processes that are designed to be participatory, evidence-based, and informed by proportionality.

References Powered by Scopus

Learning from difference: The new architecture of experimentalist governance in the EU

618Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

EU Administrative Law

370Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The function of the proportionality principle in EU law

174Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Necessity or balancing: The protection of rights under different proportionality tests - Experimental evidence

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Falling behind the PACE: lie detectors, policing and lack of foreseeability - an FOI-based study

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

De Londras, F., & Tregidga, J. (2021). Rights, proportionality, and process in EU counterterrorism lawmaking. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 19(2), 665–693. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moab047

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

50%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

50%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 1

50%

Social Sciences 1

50%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free