The educational integrity enforcement pyramid: a new framework for challenging and responding to student cheating

9Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Current approaches used by educational institutions to address the problem of student cheating are not working. This is because the discourse of academic integrity that currently dominates is, on its own, inadequate for addressing the problem. We propose that in order for higher education institutions to challenge cheating effectively, they need to learn from history and to look outside their own sector to find a new way of responding to student cheating behaviours. We propose a new framework for this. We take the theory of responsive regulation, developed by Ayres and Braithwaite, and combine it with the discourse of assessment security introduced by Dawson to form the Educational Integrity Enforcement Pyramid. We use this pyramid to show how institutions can operationalize this new approach and use it to identify gaps in their strategic response to the challenging problem of student cheating.

References Powered by Scopus

Contract cheating & the market in essays

88Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Culture change in three taxation administrations: From command-and-control to responsive regulation

70Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Defending assessment security in a digital world: Preventing E-cheating and supporting academic integrity in higher education

67Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, SciSpace and Wolfram versus higher education assessments: an updated multi-institutional study of the academic integrity impacts of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) on assessment, teaching and learning in engineering

18Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Validity matters more than cheating

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A systematic literature review of attitudes, intentions and behaviours of teaching academics pertaining to AI and generative AI (GenAI) in higher education: An analysis of GenAI adoption using the UTAUT framework

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ellis, C., & Murdoch, K. (2024). The educational integrity enforcement pyramid: a new framework for challenging and responding to student cheating. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2329167

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

25%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

25%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

25%

Researcher 2

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 8

62%

Arts and Humanities 2

15%

Psychology 2

15%

Nursing and Health Professions 1

8%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free