Resistivity modelling with topography

45Citations
Citations of this article
39Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A major difficulty of electrical resistivity forward modelling is the singularity of the potential occurring at the source location. To avoid large numerical errors, the potential is split into a primary part containing the singularity and a secondary part. The primary potential is defined analytically for flat topography, and is classically computed numerically in the presence of topography: in that case, an accurate solution requires expensive computations.We propose to define the primary potential as the analytic solution valid for a homogeneous model and flat topography, and to modify accordingly the free surface boundary condition for the secondary potential, such that the overall potential still satisfies the Poisson equation. The modified singularity removal technique thus remains fully efficient for any acquisition geometries, without any additional numerical computation, and also applicable in the presence of a buried cavity. This approach is implemented with the generalized finite difference method developed on unstructured meshes and validated through the comparison with analytical solutions. Finally, we illustrate in simple 2-D and 3-D cases how the potential depends on the shape of the topography and on the electrode positions. © The Authors 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Royal Astronomical Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Penz, Ś., Chauris, H., Donno, D., & Mehl, C. (2013). Resistivity modelling with topography. Geophysical Journal International, 194(3), 1486–1497. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggt169

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free