Family Implicit Rules, Shame, and Adolescent Prosocial and Antisocial Communication Behaviors

9Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between implicit family process rules and adolescent prosocial and antisocial communication behaviors. Data came from two-parent families in Wave 5 of the Flourishing Families Project which consisted of 322 families (fathers, mothers, and children ages 13–17). Both observational and questionnaire data were used in data collection. Prosocial and antisocial behaviors were assessed using observational codes from the Iowa Family Interaction Rating Scales. Each of the family members’ perceptions was used to assess constraining family rules and facilitative family rules. Findings showed a direct positive relationship between facilitative family process rules and prosocial communication and a negative relationship with antisocial communication for both girls and boys. Constraining family process rules were also positively related to antisocial communication behaviors in adolescents. Shame was a significant mediator of the relationship between facilitative family rules and prosocial behavior as well as between constraining family rules and antisocial behavior.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Crane, J., Harper, J. M., Bean, R. A., & Holmes, E. (2020). Family Implicit Rules, Shame, and Adolescent Prosocial and Antisocial Communication Behaviors. Family Journal, 28(1), 72–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480719896563

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free