Collegiate purpose development at the intersections of disability and social class habitus

4Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Although scholars have noted that disability is a multivalent construct that is experienced intersectionally, very little intersectional research exists about the growing population of diverse college students with disabilities. This grounded theory study elucidates how the intersections of social class and ability shaped purpose development for 59 college students with diverse disabilities. Emergent themes included student concerns about survival, living comfortably, and being dependent. We offer three theoretical propositions to provide insight into the complex intersections of social class, ability, and purpose development for college students. Recommendations for higher educators (e.g., faculty, academic advisors, career services professionals) are included.

References Powered by Scopus

Gender: An intersectionality perspective

1091Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Socioeconomic Status and College: How SES Affects College Experiences and Outcomes

418Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Purpose, hope, and life satisfaction in three age groups

386Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Intersectionality of Disabled People through a Disability Studies, Ability-Based Studies, and Intersectional Pedagogy Lens: A Survey and a Scoping Review

1Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Time Literacy: Academic Support for Neurodivergent Students in Higher Education

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Family social support for college students with disabilities

0Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vaccaro, A., Kimball, E., Newman, B. M., Moore, A., & Troiano, P. F. (2019). Collegiate purpose development at the intersections of disability and social class habitus. Review of Higher Education, 43(1), 403–426. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2019.0100

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 9

75%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

17%

Researcher 1

8%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 10

71%

Psychology 3

21%

Arts and Humanities 1

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free