Postprocessing of standard finite element velocity fields for accurate particle tracking applied to groundwater flow

2Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Particle tracking is a computationally advantageous and fast scheme to determine travel times and trajectories in subsurface hydrology. Accurate particle tracking requires element-wise mass-conservative, conforming velocity fields. This condition is not fulfilled by the standard linear Galerkin finite element method (FEM). We present a projection, which maps a non-conforming, element-wise given velocity field, computed on triangles and tetrahedra, onto a conforming velocity field in lowest-order Raviart-Thomas-Nédélec (RTN) space, which meets the requirements of accurate particle tracking. The projection is based on minimizing the difference in the hydraulic gradients at the element centroids between the standard FEM solution and the hydraulic gradients consistent with the RTN velocity field imposing element-wise mass conservation. Using the conforming velocity field in RTN space on triangles and tetrahedra, we present semi-analytical particle tracking methods for divergent and non-divergent flow. We compare the results with those obtained by a cell-centered finite volume method defined for the same elements, and a test case considering hydraulic anisotropy to an analytical solution. The velocity fields and associated particle trajectories based on the projection of the standard FEM solution are comparable to those resulting from the finite volume method, but the projected fields are smoother within zones of piecewise uniform hydraulic conductivity. While the RTN-projected standard FEM solution is thus more accurate, the computational costs of the cell-centered finite volume approach are considerably smaller.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Selzer, P., & Cirpka, O. A. (2020). Postprocessing of standard finite element velocity fields for accurate particle tracking applied to groundwater flow. Computational Geosciences, 24(4), 1605–1624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-020-09969-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free