Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in pregnancy; does it influence our practice?

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: Maternal hypertensive disorder is a well-known medical problem during pregnancy and is associated with morbidity and mortality. Out-of-office blood pressure (BP) measurement has been widely used but the importance of detecting white coat hypertension (WCH) is still a topic for debate. Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of WCH in high-risk pregnant women. Methods:We included 56 pregnant women with in-office higher-than-normal BP without previous history of HTN to assess their BP using 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Results: The mean age of the participants was 31.61±5.42 years (n = 56) and the majority in the second or third trimesters. Hypertension was detected in 55.4% using 24-hour ABPM. Twenty-five patients (44.6%) had WCH, 60% of whom were in the third trimester. There was a significant difference in the incidence of WCH between women younger than 30 and older individuals (P = 0.041). The mean age was 33.13±5.16 years in patients with true HTN and 29.72±5.22 years in WCH patients (P = 0.018). Conclusions: The prevalence of WCH in pregnancy is noteworthy. Regarding its favorable outcome, this might be a heads-up to avoid unnecessary medication during pregnancy and be concise about defining HTN in this population.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Najafi, M. T., Salehi, S., Alamdari, A., & Naderi, N. (2019). Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in pregnancy; does it influence our practice? Nephro-Urology Monthly, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.5812/numonthly.93157

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free