Ethics and Integrity in Research

  • Iphofen R
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

While it can be argued that the values, principles, and standards that underpin ethical research must apply to all disciplines and professions that conduct research, it remains the case that most, if not all, still seek to devise and apply distinctive ethical codes and/or guidelines that they perceive as specific to their own, specialized field. While highly generalized overarching principles can be accepted, their generality may be regarded as so vague they are impossible to disagree with. Moreover they fail to assist researchers within the specialist professional domain with practical solutions to the ethical issues they may have to confront in their everyday practice. Such an approach could be regarded as a restrictive practice and domain protectionism – but there are also clear practical advantages in a discipline being able to manage its own professional practices and rarely is it the case that generic codes provide some form of “off-the-shelf” solution to an ethical problem within the discipline’s domain. This chapter addresses issues that form the backcloth to the concerns raised by the authors in this section of the handbook.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Iphofen, R. (2020). Ethics and Integrity in Research. In Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity (pp. 739–749). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16759-2_56

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free