Maternal health care professionals’ experiences and views on the use of obstetric ultrasound in Rwanda: A cross-sectional study

1Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: This study, undertaken in Rwanda, aimed to investigate health professionals’ experiences and views on the following topics: current clinical guidelines for ultrasound from second trimester at the clinic, regional and national levels, and adherence to clinical guidelines; medically indicated ultrasound examinations; non-medical use of ultrasound including ultrasounds on maternal request; commercialisation of ultrasound; the value of ultrasound in relation to other clinical examinations in pregnancy; and ultrasound and medicalisation of pregnancy. Methods: A cross-sectional design was adopted. Health professionals providing antenatal care and delivery services to pregnant women in 108 health facilities were invited to complete a survey, which was developed based on the results of earlier qualitative studies undertaken as part of the CROss Country Ultrasound Study (CROCUS). Results: Nine hundred and seven health professionals participated: obstetricians/gynecologists (3.2%,) other physicians (24.5%), midwives (29.7%) and nurses (42.7%). Few physicians reported the existence of clinical guidelines at clinic, regional or national levels in Rwanda, and guidelines were moderately adhered to. Three obstetric ultrasound examinations were considered medically indicated in an uncomplicated pregnancy. Most participants (73.0%) were positive about obstetric ultrasound examinations on maternal request. Commercialisation was not considered a problem, and the majority (88.5%) agreed that ultrasound had contributed to medicalisation of pregnancy. Conclusions: Findings indicate that clinical guidelines for the use of obstetric ultrasound are limited in Rwanda. Non-medically indicated obstetric ultrasound was not considered a current problem at any level of the healthcare system. The positive attitude to obstetric ultrasound examinations on maternal request may contribute to further burden on a maternal health care system with limited resources. It is essential that limited obstetric ultrasound resources are allocated where they are most beneficial, and clearly stated medical indications would likely facilitate this.

References Powered by Scopus

ISUOG practice guidelines: Performance of first-trimester fetal ultrasound scan

480Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Practice Bulletin No. 175: Ultrasound in Pregnancy

0
220Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A literature update on maternal-fetal attachment

208Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Ultrasound imaging and the culture of pregnancy management in low-and middle-income countries: A systematic review

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mogren, I., Ntaganira, J., Sengoma, J. P. S., Holmlund, S., Small, R., Pham Thi, L., … Edvardsson, K. (2021). Maternal health care professionals’ experiences and views on the use of obstetric ultrasound in Rwanda: A cross-sectional study. BMC Health Services Research, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06758-w

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 10

56%

Researcher 4

22%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

17%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

6%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Nursing and Health Professions 7

39%

Medicine and Dentistry 7

39%

Social Sciences 2

11%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2

11%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free