Feasibility of noninvasive continuous finger arterial blood pressure measurements in very young children, aged 0-4 years

17Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Our goal was to study the feasibility of continuous noninvasive finger blood pressure (BP) monitoring in very young children, aged 0-4 y. To achieve this, we designed a set of small-sized finger cuffs based on the assessment of finger circumference. Finger arterial BP measured by a volume clamp device (Finapres technology) was compared with simultaneously measured intra-arterial BP in 15 very young children (median age, 5 mo; range, 0-48), admitted to the intensive care unit for vital monitoring. The finger cuff-derived BP waveforms showed good resemblance with the invasive arterial waveforms (mean root-mean-square error, 3 mm Hg). The correlation coefficient between both methods was 0.79 ± 0.19 systolic and 0.74 ± 0.24 diastolic. The correlation coefficient of beat-to-beat changes between both methods was 0.82 ± 0.18 and 0.75 ± 0.21, respectively. Three measurements were related to measurement errors (loose cuff application; wrong set-point). Excluding these erroneous measurements resulted in clinically acceptable measurement bias (-3.8 mm Hg) and 95% limits of agreement (-10.4 to + 2.8 mm Hg) of mean BP values. We conclude that continuous finger BP measurement is feasible in very young children. However, cuff application is critical, and the current set-point algorithm needs to be revised in very young children. Copyright © 2008 International Pediatric Research Foundation, Inc.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Andriessen, P., Schraa, O., Van Den Bosch-Ruis, W., Jan Ten Harkel, D., Settels, J. J., Oetomo, S. B., & Blanco, C. E. (2008). Feasibility of noninvasive continuous finger arterial blood pressure measurements in very young children, aged 0-4 years. Pediatric Research, 63(6), 691–696. https://doi.org/10.1203/PDR.0b013e31816c8fe3

Readers over time

‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24036912

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 12

55%

Researcher 7

32%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 19

70%

Nursing and Health Professions 3

11%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3

11%

Engineering 2

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0