Web services reputation assessment using a hidden Markov model

50Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We present an approach for reputation assessment in service-oriented environments. We define key metrics to aggregate the feedbacks of different raters, for assessing a service provider's reputation. In situations where rater feedbacks are not readily available, we use a Hidden Markov Models (HMM) to predict the reputation of a service provider. HMMs have proven to be suitable in numerous research areas for modelling dynamic systems. We propose to emulate the success of such systems for evaluating service reputations to enable trust-based interactions with and amongst Web services. The experiment details included in this paper show the applicability of the proposed HMM-based reputation assessment model. © 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.

References Powered by Scopus

An Introduction to Hidden Markov Models

3480Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

PeerTrust: Supporting reputation-based trust for peer-to-peer electronic communities

1629Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A logic for uncertain probabilities

898Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

A survey of trust in social networks

553Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A novel method for calculating service reputation

62Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Consumption behavior of eco-friendly products and applications of ICT innovation

60Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Malik, Z., Akbar, I., & Bouguettaya, A. (2009). Web services reputation assessment using a hidden Markov model. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 5900 LNCS, pp. 576–591). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10383-4_42

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 18

82%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

9%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 20

87%

Business, Management and Accounting 1

4%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1

4%

Engineering 1

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free