Clinical outcomes in men with prostate cancer who selected active surveillance using a clinical cell cycle risk score

11Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate active surveillance (AS) selection, safety and durability among men with low-risk prostate cancer assessed using the clinical cell cycle risk (CCR) score, a combined clinical and molecular score. Patients & methods: Initial treatment selection (AS vs treatment) and duration of AS were evaluated for men with low-risk prostate cancer according to the CCR score and National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. Adverse events included biochemical recurrence and metastasis. Results: 82.4% (547/664) of men initially selected AS (median follow-up: 2.2 years), 0.4% (2/547) of whom experienced an adverse event. Two-thirds of patients remained on AS for more than 3 years; patient choice was the most common reason for leaving AS. Conclusion: The CCR score may aid in the identification of men who can safely defer prostate cancer treatment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kaul, S., Wojno, K. J., Stone, S., Evans, B., Bernhisel, R., Meek, S., … Ehdaie, B. (2019). Clinical outcomes in men with prostate cancer who selected active surveillance using a clinical cell cycle risk score. Personalized Medicine, 16(6), 491–499. https://doi.org/10.2217/pme-2019-0084

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free