Impact of intensive glycemic control on acute renal injury: A randomized clinical trial

1Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of intensive glycemic control on the reduction of the incidence of acute renal injury in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Methods: Randomized clinical trial, evaluating 95 patients undergoing two glycemic control strategies. Patients were randomized to the intervention n group (IG), with the goal of maintaining postoperative glycemia between 90 and 110 mg/dl. For patients allocated into the conventional group (CG) the goal was to maintain glycaemia between 140 and 180 mg/dl. The insulin dose adjustment was based on undiluted arterial blood glucose measurements at one hour intervals, by means of a blood glucose and beta-ketone monitoring system. Results: The incidence of acute kidney injury was 53.7% (KDIGO stages 1, 2 or 3). There was no significant difference between the groups regarding the primary outcome (p=0.294). However, a greater frequency of complete renal function recovery (p = 0.010), ICU discharge (p = 0.028), and hospital discharge (p = 0.048) was found among patients undergoing conventional glycemic control. The use of intensive glycemic control was associated with longer ICU stay (p=0.031). The number of episodes of hypoglycemia was similar in both groups (1.6±0.9 vs. 1.3±0.6, p=0.731), demonstrating the safety of the strategies used. Conclusion: The impact of intensive glycemic control on reducing the incidence of acute kidney injury was not observed. In contrast, patients treated in the CG had a higher frequency of complete renal function recovery.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Santana-Santos, E., Kanke, P. H., de Cássia Almeida Vieira, R., de Oliveira, L. B., de Lucena Ferretti-Rebustini, R. E., de Menezes, A. F., … Hajjar, L. A. (2019). Impact of intensive glycemic control on acute renal injury: A randomized clinical trial. ACTA Paulista de Enfermagem, 32(6), 592–599. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-0194201900083

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free