Erratum to: "Evaluation of quality improvement for cesarean sections programmes through mixed methods" [Implement Sci., 9, (2014) (182)] DOI: 10.1186/s13012-014-0182-0

0Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Unfortunately, the original version of this article [1] contained an error. The acknowledgements was included incorrectly. The correct acknowledgements can be found below. The authors gratefully acknowledge the funding of this research provided by the Ministry of Health and Consumers' Affairs - -Spain (FIS Exp. PI13/01340 and FEDER funds) and the CHIR- Quebec Training Network in Perinatal Research (QTNPR). The study funders had no role in the study design, data analysis, data collection, data interpretation or the writing of the report. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily of the funding bodies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bermúdez-Tamayo, C., Johri, M., Perez-Ramos, F. J., Maroto-Navarro, G., Caño-Aguilar, A., Garcia-Mochon, L., … Chaillet, N. (2016). Erratum to: “Evaluation of quality improvement for cesarean sections programmes through mixed methods” [Implement Sci., 9, (2014) (182)] DOI: 10.1186/s13012-014-0182-0. Implementation Science. BioMed Central Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1186/S13012-016-0402-X

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free