Implications of Commodity Programs and Crop Insurance Policies for Wheat Producers

10Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We analyze the effects of Price Loss Coverage (PLC), Agriculture Risk Coverage (ARC), individual revenue protection insurance (RP), and Supplemental Coverage Option (SCO) on the RP coverage level, certainty equivalent, and program payments. The model is calibrated to a representative wheat farm in Mitchell County in Kansas to analyze the effects of various policies. The result highlights that when insurance is framed as an investment, cumulative prospect theory predicts farmers' coverage decisions accurately at 70%. ARC or PLC program increases the RP coverage level to 75%, but PLC and SCO jointly decrease the RP coverage level to 70%.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Luckstead, J., & Devadoss, S. (2019). Implications of Commodity Programs and Crop Insurance Policies for Wheat Producers. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 51(2), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1017/aae.2018.32

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free