A machine learning-enabled process optimization of ultra-fast flow chemistry with multiple reaction metrics

6Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Discovering the optimum process parameters of ultra-fast reactions, such as lithium-halogen exchange reactions, is typically achieved by time and resource inefficient methods including one factor at a time optimization (OFAT) or classical factorial design of experiments (DoE). Herein, we demonstrate the development of a machine learning workflow coupled with a flow chemistry platform for the optimization of the reaction conditions of a lithium-halogen exchange reaction. Flow chemistry platform allowed us to precisely control the process parameters (temperature, residence time and stoichiometry) and enabled robust and reliable data collection to train a machine learning algorithm. A Bayesian multi-objective optimization algorithm TSEMO (Thompson sampling efficient multi-objective optimization) was used to optimize the process parameters and to build process knowledge for different optimization campaigns with different mixing intensifications (capillary reactor vs. microchip reactor). The algorithm successfully identified a set of optimal conditions corresponding the trade-off between yield and impurity in different optimization campaigns. Furthermore, the optimization results and Gaussian process (GP) surrogate models within TSEMO were further analyzed to infer the operating regime of the system for different mixing intensifications (mixing controlled vs. reaction-controlled regime). The machine learning workflow has proven to be robust and data efficient, revealing rich information about the reaction studied compared to single-objective, OFAT and DoE approaches.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Karan, D., Chen, G., Jose, N., Bai, J., McDaid, P., & Lapkin, A. A. (2023). A machine learning-enabled process optimization of ultra-fast flow chemistry with multiple reaction metrics. Reaction Chemistry and Engineering, 9(3), 619–629. https://doi.org/10.1039/d3re00539a

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free