Infant pupil diameter changes in response to others' positive and negative emotions

102Citations
Citations of this article
260Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

It has been suggested that infants resonate emotionally to others' positive and negative affect displays, and that these responses become stronger towards emotions with negative valence around the age of 12-months. In this study we measured 6- and 12-month-old infants' changes in pupil diameter when presented with the image and sound of peers experiencing happiness, distress and an emotionally neutral state. For all participants the perception of another's distress triggered larger pupil diameters. Perceiving other's happiness also induced larger pupil diameters but for shorter time intervals. Importantly, we also found evidence for an asymmetry in autonomous arousal towards positive versus negative emotional displays. Larger pupil sizes for another's distress compared to another's happiness were recorded shortly after stimulus onset for the older infants, and in a later time window for the 6-month-olds. These findings suggest that arousal responses for negative as well as for positive emotions are present in the second half of the first postnatal year. Importantly, an asymmetry with stronger responses for negative emotions seems to be already present at this age. © 2011 Geangu et al.

Figures

  • Figure 1. Mean functional change in pupil diameter for each type of stimulus. After filtration and interpolation, the pupil measurements from both eyes were averaged. Baseline-correction was performed by subtracting the mean pupil diameter from the last one second of the preceding inter-trial from each data point recorded during the stimulus presentation. The change in pupil size from baseline for the neutral (purple line), positive (black line), and negative (green line) stimulus is presented separately for 6- (A) and 12-month-old infants (B). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027132.g001
  • Figure 2. Looking time to the peer’s face. Looking time to the peers’ faces during the neutral (black), positive (gray), and negative (white) emotional display was computed as percentage from the total looking time towards the stimulus. Error bars represent SEs. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027132.g002
  • Figure 3. The effect of stimulus luminance on pupil dilation. We explored whether variations in stimulus luminance across video frames have a significant effect on the recorded changes in pupil size. It was predicted that as stimulus luminance increases, an adjustment reaction with decreasing pupil size would be recorded. It was found that the emotional valence of the stimuli explained a big proportion of the variation, partial g2 = .32, while variations in luminance across the movies had an extremely small effect, partial g2 = .04. The relation between the effect of luminance on pupil size differed across emotions (F(2, 7500) = 217.77, p,.001). When controlling for other sources of variations between videos [69], the relation between luminance and pupil size is positive (.42), and this could be due to the overall tendency of the pupil to increase with stimulus presentation. Illuminance measured at the level of the eye during the presentation of each video was within a range not expected to yield significant differences in pupil size (15.060.5 Lux) [50]. All this information suggests that the observed differences in luminance and illuminance between stimuli could not produce the differences in pupil size related to the emotional valence. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027132.g003
  • Figure 4. Six-month-old infants’ pupil size changes in response to others’ affective displays. In Panel A, functional expression of changes in the 6-month-olds baseline corrected pupil size in response to others’ neutral (purple line), positive (black line), and negative (green line) emotional displays. Panel B shows the value of t statistic as a function of time for each pair of stimuli comparison: positive vs. neutral (red line), negative vs. neutral (green line), and negative vs. positive (blue line). The one-tailed critical values of t are represented by the vertical lines with (dotted) and without (solid) Bonferroni correction for three comparisons. The difference is considered to be significant when this line is reached or surpassed. Marked with dark gray are those time windows in which both emotional conditions triggered larger pupil diameters than the neutral one, and the hypothesized negativity bias occurred. Marked with light gray are those time windows where negative emotions triggered larger pupil diameter compared to the emotionally neutral state. (Note that the shaded areas are for illustrative purposes only, marking the time window in which the effect occurred and not the effect duration.) doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027132.g004
  • Figure 5. Twelve-month-old infants’ pupil size changes in response to others’ affective displays. In Panel A, functional expression of changes in the 12-month-olds baseline corrected pupil size in response to others’ neutral (purple line), positive (black line), and negative (green line) emotional displays. Panel B shows the value of t statistic as a function of time for each pair of stimuli comparison: positive vs. neutral (red line), negative vs. neutral (green line), and negative vs. positive (blue line). The one-tailed critical values of t are represented by the vertical lines with (dotted) and without (solid) Bonferroni correction for three comparisons. The difference is considered to be significant when this line is reached or surpassed. Marked with dark gray are those time windows in which both emotional conditions triggered larger pupil diameters than the neutral one, and the hypothesized negativity bias occurred. Marked with light gray are those time windows where negative emotions triggered larger pupil diameter compared to the emotionally neutral state. (Note that the shaded areas are for illustrative purposes only, marking the time window in which the effect occurred and not the effect duration.) doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0027132.g005

References Powered by Scopus

Bad Is Stronger Than Good

5813Citations
2348Readers
Get full text
3008Citations
2013Readers
Get full text
1703Citations
2042Readers
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

476Citations
1013Readers

This article is free to access.

Pupillometry

329Citations
571Readers
Get full text
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Geangu, E., Hauf, P., Bhardwaj, R., & Bentz, W. (2011). Infant pupil diameter changes in response to others’ positive and negative emotions. PLoS ONE, 6(11). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027132

Readers over time

‘11‘12‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘25015304560

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 118

69%

Researcher 31

18%

Professor / Associate Prof. 15

9%

Lecturer / Post doc 6

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 155

84%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11

6%

Medicine and Dentistry 10

5%

Engineering 9

5%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
References: 1
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 10

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0