Neuronal differences between chronic low back pain and depression regarding long-term habituation to pain

45Citations
Citations of this article
95Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background Longitudinal studies of experimental pain are rare and little is known about the differences regarding sensitization and habituation over longer periods in patients with chronic pain or depression compared with controls. Methods We used a standardized longitudinal painful heat paradigm that was designed to induce long-term habituation in 19 patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP), 21 patients with depression (DEP) and 21 healthy participants (controls) over a time course of eight consecutive days. We applied functional magnetic resonance imaging on the first and last day of this period and after 3 months. Results Although the pain paradigm was standardized, patients with DEP exhibited significantly higher pain thresholds and a trend to higher pain ratings and, in functional imaging, showed less activation of the operculum and the secondary somatosensory cortex (S2) as compared to patients with CLBP and controls. Conversely, patients with CLBP showed increased activation in the anterior insula and parietal operculum as compared to patients with DEP and controls. Within session, all participants sensitized to pain, which was associated with higher activation levels in the thalamus, amygdala, midcingulate cortex, and sensory and motor areas. However, patients with depression showed significantly less activation in midbrain and brainstem areas. Conclusion Given that pain and depression potentiate each other clinically, our data suggest that this may involve different cortical pain areas. © 2013 European Pain Federation - EFIC®.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rodriguez-Raecke, R., Ihle, K., Ritter, C., Muhtz, C., Otte, C., & May, A. (2014). Neuronal differences between chronic low back pain and depression regarding long-term habituation to pain. European Journal of Pain (United Kingdom), 18(5), 701–711. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1532-2149.2013.00407.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free