Status of cardiovascular health among adult Americans in the 50 States and the District of Columbia, 2009.

80Citations
Citations of this article
113Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

With ideal cardiovascular health metrics, the American Heart Association established a goal of improving cardiovascular health for all Americans by 20% by 2020. Determining how the metrics vary by state is important to the individual states as well as to researchers and policy makers nationwide. Using 2009 data from Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, a state-based telephone survey with 356 441 eligible participants, we examined the 7 metrics defined by the American Heart Association: hypertension, high cholesterol, smoking, body mass index, diabetes, physical activity, and consumption of fruits and vegetables. The 3 primary outcomes of this study were (1) the percentage of the population achieving ideal health status on all 7 factors, (2) the percentage of the population with only 0 to 2 of the 7 metrics (poor cardiovascular health); and (3) the mean overall score (number of ideal metrics). Overall, 3.3% of population was in ideal cardiovascular health, and 9.9% was in poor cardiovascular health. The mean overall score was 4.42. The percentage with ideal cardiovascular health varied from 1.2% (Oklahoma) to 6.9% (District of Columbia ). The adjusted prevalence ratio of ideal cardiovascular health ranged from 0.38, 95% confidence interval 0.29 to 0.52 (Oklahoma), to 1.91, 95% confidence interval 1.51 to 2.42 (District of Columbia), with Illinois as the referent. In the United States, the cardiovascular health status of the population varies substantially by state. The estimates here could help state programs charged with preventing heart disease and stroke to set their goals for reducing risk and improving cardiovascular health in their jurisdictions.

Figures

  • Table 1. BRFSS Questions and Definitions for Ideal Cardiovascular Health Metrics
  • Table 2. Age-Standardized* Results for Cardiovascular Health Metrics by Sociodemographic Characteristics, BRFSS 2009
  • Table 3. Age-Standardized Results for Cardiovascular Health Metrics by State, BRFSS, 2009
  • Table 3. Continued
  • Figure 1. Age-standardized cardiovascular health status by US states, BRFSS, 2009. A, Age-standardized prevalence of population with ideal cardiovascular health by states. B, Age-standardized percentage of population with 0 to 2 cardiovascular health metrics by states. C, Age-standardized mean score of cardiovascular health metrics by states. BRFSS indicates Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.
  • Figure 2. Adjusted prevalence ratio of ideal cardiovascular health by state, BRFSS, 2009. BRFSS indicates Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.
  • Table 5. Age-Standardized* Results for Cardiovascular Health Metrics by Sociodemographic Characteristics, Including Participants With History of Coronary Heart Disease and Stroke, BRFSS, 2009
  • Figure 3. Adjusted prevalence ratio of ideal cardiovascular health by state, including patients with coronary heart disease and stroke, BRFSS, 2009. BRFSS indicates Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics'2017 Update: A Report from the American Heart Association

7511Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Heart disease and stroke statistics - 2018 update: A report from the American Heart Association

5746Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics - 2014 Update: A report from the American Heart Association

4820Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fang, J., Yang, Q., Hong, Y., & Loustalot, F. (2012). Status of cardiovascular health among adult Americans in the 50 States and the District of Columbia, 2009. Journal of the American Heart Association, 1(6). https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.112.005371

Readers over time

‘13‘14‘15‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘23‘24‘2506121824

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 38

63%

Researcher 17

28%

Lecturer / Post doc 3

5%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 32

58%

Social Sciences 10

18%

Nursing and Health Professions 8

15%

Psychology 5

9%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0