Open Science and Research Reproducibility

23Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Many scientists, journals and funders are concerned about the low reproducibility of many scientific findings. One approach that may serve to improve the reliability and robustness of research is open science. Here I argue that the process of pre-registering study protocols, sharing study materials and data, and posting preprints of manuscripts may serve to improve quality control procedures at every stage of the research pipeline, and in turn improve the reproducibility of published work.

References Powered by Scopus

Why most published research findings are false

6782Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

Cited by Powered by Scopus

This article is free to access.

This article is free to access.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Munafo, M. (2016). Open Science and Research Reproducibility. Ecancermedicalscience. ecancer Global Foundation. https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2016.ed56

Readers over time

‘16‘17‘18‘19‘20‘21‘22‘2402468

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 16

67%

Researcher 5

21%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

8%

Lecturer / Post doc 1

4%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Psychology 7

41%

Medicine and Dentistry 4

24%

Computer Science 3

18%

Business, Management and Accounting 3

18%

Article Metrics

Tooltip
Mentions
News Mentions: 2
Social Media
Shares, Likes & Comments: 48

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0