Aesthetic regime's occupation of representation

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This article explores the relationship between aesthetics and representation in Jacques Rancière's theory. According to the author, representation is simultaneously present and prohibited in modern aesthetics. It appears as a parasite or an intruder in artistic production. Rancière asks: under what conditions is representation prohibited and what happens when art does not represent? The central axis in the analysis explores the consequences of this configuration, with emphasis on politics. According to Rancière, the concept of distribution of the sensible invariably implies a regime of life and, therefore, some sort of politics. Hence, aesthetics is not limited to arts, reaching life as a whole. The relationship between aesthetics and representation necessarily implies a mode of life where representation becomes impossible in all senses.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Listik, Y. (2018). Aesthetic regime’s occupation of representation. Kriterion (Brazil), 59(139), 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-512X2017n13916yl

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free