Dangerous advances in measurements from digital subtraction angiography: When is a millimeter not a millimeter?

14Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aneurysms need accurate millimeters (mm). Direct millimeters were lost with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) years ago, with measurements in pixels. Advances in DSA can now give inherent millimeters. The Cerecyte aneurysm coiling trial's angiographic core lab assesses images from compact disc (CD). External fiducials for millimeter calibration are required. Of 25 cases with two 10 mm fiducials, near and far from the intensifies the midline mean is between 9 "mm" to 15 "mm". Yet 10 mm must be 10 mm. This variance is potentially dangerous. Proprietary software seems to prohibit calibration transfer via CD to another vendor's system.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fox, A. J., Millar, J., Raymond, J., Pryor, J. C., Roy, D., Tomlinson, G. A., … Molyneux, A. J. (2009, March). Dangerous advances in measurements from digital subtraction angiography: When is a millimeter not a millimeter? American Journal of Neuroradiology. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1381

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free