Why Publish a Systematic Review: An Editor’s and Reader’s Perspective

9Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Systematic reviews provide more than just a summary of the research literature related to a particular topic or question--rather they offer clear and compelling answers to questions related to the ”who,” "why," and "when" of studies. In this chapter, the authors draw on their experiences with systematic reviews—one as an editor of a highly regarded educational research journal, the other as a researcher and review author—to trace the growing popularity of systematic reviews in education literature and to pose a series of challenges to aspiring review authors to motivate and enliven their work. In particular, the authors stress the importance of melding scientific and rigorous review procedures with ’stylish’ academic writing that engages its audience through effective storytelling, attention to context (the people, places, policies, and practices represented in the studies under review), and clear implications for research and practice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dowd, A. C., & Johnson, R. M. (2019). Why Publish a Systematic Review: An Editor’s and Reader’s Perspective. In Systematic Reviews in Educational Research: Methodology, Perspectives and Application (pp. 69–87). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27602-7_5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free