Predicting Concreteness and Imageability of Words within and across Languages via Word Embeddings

27Citations
Citations of this article
97Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The notions of concreteness and imageability, traditionally important in psycholinguistics, are gaining significance in semantic-oriented natural language processing tasks. In this paper we investigate the predictability of these two concepts via supervised learning, using word embeddings as explanatory variables. We perform predictions both within and across languages by exploiting collections of cross-lingual embeddings aligned to a single vector space. We show that the notions of concreteness and imageability are highly predictable both within and across languages, with a moderate loss of up to 20% in correlation when predicting across languages. We further show that the cross-lingual transfer via word embeddings is more efficient than the simple transfer via bilingual dictionaries.

References Powered by Scopus

Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas

1337Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

MRC psycholinguistic database: Machine-usable dictionary, version 2.00

913Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Inducing domain-specific sentiment lexicons from unlabeled corpora

236Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Predicting word concreteness and imagery

25Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Estimating the imageability of words by mining visual characteristics from crawled image data

15Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The Croatian psycholinguistic database: Estimates for 6000 nouns, verbs, adjectives and adverbs

14Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ljubešić, N., Fišer, D., & Peti-Stantić, A. (2018). Predicting Concreteness and Imageability of Words within and across Languages via Word Embeddings. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 217–222). Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/w18-3028

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 26

67%

Researcher 9

23%

Professor / Associate Prof. 2

5%

Lecturer / Post doc 2

5%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Computer Science 29

64%

Linguistics 9

20%

Psychology 5

11%

Social Sciences 2

4%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free