Ruminal alkalizing potential of brucite and sodium bicarbonate in feedlot cattle diets

0Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives: The effects of brucite (BR; magnesium hydroxide) and sodium bicarbonate (SB) on ruminal fermentation characteristics were evaluated following a ruminal glucose challenge. Materials and Methods: Four Holstein steers were used in a 4 × 4 Latin square design with 4 dietary treatments: (1) control (CTL; no buffer), (2) 0.5% BR, (3) 1% BR, or (4) 1% SB. The basal diet contained 70% steam-flaked wheat. On the collection day, 500 g of glucose was introduced through a ruminal cannula 1 h after the morning feeding. Results and Discussion: Time required for 50% reactivity at pH 6.0 of BR and SB was 450 and 0.5 min, respectively. Ruminal pH tended to decrease (P < 0.09) 1 h after feeding (just before the glucose challenge), but ruminal fluid buffer capacity was greater (P = 0.01) 1 h before feeding for CTL than buffer-supplemented diets. Average pH was not influenced by buffer supplementation. Buffers tended (P = 0.07) to reduce average ruminal buffer capacity. Ruminal pH and lactate had an inverse relationship (r = −0.59). Average ruminal VFA concentration tended to be lower (P = 0.06) for SB than BR. Compared with CTL, buffers decreased (P = 0.03) ruminal protozoa. Supplemental BR had lower (P < 0.05) average ruminal glucose concentration than SB. Buffer supplementation decreased average ruminal osmolality (P = 0.02). Implications and Applications: Ruminal alkalizing equivalence of BR and SB were similar. Neither appreciably altered ruminal buffering capacity. Although, both reduced ruminal lactate during the first few hours following a glucose challenge. Buffer supplementation may depress ruminal protozoa.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Montaño, M. F., Chirino, J. O., Paredes, D., Salinas-Chavira, J., & Zinn, R. A. (2022). Ruminal alkalizing potential of brucite and sodium bicarbonate in feedlot cattle diets. Applied Animal Science, 38(4), 326–334. https://doi.org/10.15232/aas.2021-02240

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free