A Nomogram Predicts Individual Prognosis in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma by Integrating the Extent of Resection of Non-Enhancing Tumors

4Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The extent of resection of non-contrast enhancing tumors (EOR-NCEs) has been shown to be associated with prognosis in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (nGBM). This study aimed to develop and independently validate a nomogram integrated with EOR-NCE to assess individual prognosis. Methods: Data for this nomogram were based on 301 patients hospitalized for nGBM from October 2011 to April 2019 at the Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University. These patients were randomly divided into derivation (n=181) and validation (n=120) cohorts at a ratio of 6:4. To evaluate predictive accuracy, discriminative ability, and clinical net benefit, concordance index (C-index), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were calculated for the extent of resection of contrast enhancing tumor (EOR-CE) and EOR-NCE nomograms. Comparison between these two models was performed as well. Results: The Cox proportional hazards model was used to establish nomograms for this study. Older age at diagnosis, Karnofsky performance status (KPS)<70, unmethylated O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) status, wild-type isocitrate dehydrogenase enzyme (IDH), and lower EOR-CE and EOR-NCE were independent factors associated with shorter survival. The EOR-NCE nomogram had a higher C-index than the EOR-CE nomogram. Its calibration curve for the probability of survival exhibited good agreement between the identical and actual probabilities. The EOR-NCE nomogram showed superior net benefits and improved performance over the EOR-CE nomogram with respect to DCA and ROC for survival probability. These results were also confirmed in the validation cohort. Conclusions: An EOR-NCE nomogram assessing individualized survival probabilities (12-, 18-, and 24-month) for patients with nGBM could be useful to provide patients and their relatives with health care consultations on optimizing therapeutic approaches and prognosis.

References Powered by Scopus

Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma

17454Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary

12255Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A multivariate analysis of 416 patients with glioblastoma multiforme: Prognosis, extent of resection, and survival

2542Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Nomograms for prognostic risk assessment in glioblastoma multiforme: Applications and limitations

6Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Comparative Analysis of the Prognostic Significance of IDH,TERT, EGFR and MGMT Status in Patients with Adult Non-H3-Altered Grade 4 Gliomas: A Prospective Cohort Study

3Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Effects of gross total resection and subtotal resection on survival outcomes of glioma patients: a meta-analysis

2Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, Z., Jin, Z., Liu, D., Zhang, Y., Li, C., Miao, Y., … Ji, N. (2020). A Nomogram Predicts Individual Prognosis in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma by Integrating the Extent of Resection of Non-Enhancing Tumors. Frontiers in Oncology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.598965

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 2

40%

Researcher 2

40%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

20%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Medicine and Dentistry 6

86%

Environmental Science 1

14%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free