Meta-analysis and Mendelian randomization: A review

745Citations
Citations of this article
213Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Mendelian randomization (MR) uses genetic variants as instrumental variables to infer whether a risk factor causally affects a health outcome. Meta-analysis has been used historically in MR to combine results from separate epidemiological studies, with each study using a small but select group of genetic variants. In recent years, it has been used to combine genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary data for large numbers of genetic variants. Heterogeneity among the causal estimates obtained from multiple genetic variants points to a possible violation of the necessary instrumental variable assumptions. In this article, we provide a basic introduction to MR and the instrumental variable theory that it relies upon. We then describe how random effects models, meta-regression, and robust regression are being used to test and adjust for heterogeneity in order to improve the rigor of the MR approach.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bowden, J., & Holmes, M. V. (2019, December 1). Meta-analysis and Mendelian randomization: A review. Research Synthesis Methods. John Wiley and Sons Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1346

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free