Mendelian randomization (MR) uses genetic variants as instrumental variables to infer whether a risk factor causally affects a health outcome. Meta-analysis has been used historically in MR to combine results from separate epidemiological studies, with each study using a small but select group of genetic variants. In recent years, it has been used to combine genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary data for large numbers of genetic variants. Heterogeneity among the causal estimates obtained from multiple genetic variants points to a possible violation of the necessary instrumental variable assumptions. In this article, we provide a basic introduction to MR and the instrumental variable theory that it relies upon. We then describe how random effects models, meta-regression, and robust regression are being used to test and adjust for heterogeneity in order to improve the rigor of the MR approach.
CITATION STYLE
Bowden, J., & Holmes, M. V. (2019, December 1). Meta-analysis and Mendelian randomization: A review. Research Synthesis Methods. John Wiley and Sons Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1346
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.