Peer evaluation in CMC learning environment and writing skill

15Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Peer evaluation and technology-based instruction as the various domains of language teaching perspectives might affect language development. Group work in a technology-based environment might be more successful when learners are involved in developing the assessment process particularly peer assessment. This study investigated the effectiveness of peer evaluation in technology-based language environment and its effects on English writing ability. To reach this goal, 70 Iranian learners were participated in English language writing context. They were divided into two groups, one group assigned to CMC (Computer-Mediated Communication) language learning context and the other assigned to a traditional learning environment. Both groups were encouraged to evaluate their classmates’ writing tasks. In addition, interviews were conducted with two learners. Comparing these two groups provides comprehensive guidelines for teachers as well as curriculum designers to set adjusted writing language environment for more effective and creative language teaching and learning. E-collaboration classroom tasks have high intrinsic motivation as well as significant effects on learners’ outcomes. Cooperative tasks specifically in technology-based environment lead learners to group working and consequently group learning. Computer-Mediated Communication is meaningful, especially in contexts in which teachers stimulate group work activities.

References Powered by Scopus

Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature

689Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Peer learning and assessment

635Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Restructuring Classroom Interaction with Networked Computers: Effects on Quantity and Characteristics of Language Production

478Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

The role of technology-facilitated peer assessment and supporting strategies: a meta-analysis

52Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Online Versus Offline Peer Feedback in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis

25Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Flipped classroom: Challenges and benefits of using social media in English language teaching and learning

21Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mellati, M., & Khademi, M. (2014). Peer evaluation in CMC learning environment and writing skill. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 3(5), 220–228. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.3n.5p.220

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Lecturer / Post doc 15

44%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 14

41%

Professor / Associate Prof. 4

12%

Researcher 1

3%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Social Sciences 12

43%

Arts and Humanities 8

29%

Linguistics 6

21%

Psychology 2

7%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free